Insights on Belgian tax law and AI-powered research
First-stage retrieval finds 100 matches. Reranking identifies the 5 that actually answer your question. Here's why that distinction matters for legal AI.
Keyword search finds exact article numbers. Semantic search finds related concepts. Hybrid search does both — and the difference is measurable.
Most AI implementations fail because firms skip the trust-building phase. A practical 4-phase framework for Belgian tax practices.
A couple in Antwerp with €2M in assets. Two children in different regions. Three inheritance tax regimes. Here's how the numbers diverge — and what a complete advisory analysis actually looks like.
The AI Act entered into force on 1 August 2024. Some provisions are already active. Most articles confuse provider obligations with deployer obligations — here's the distinction that matters for your practice.
AI adoption in accounting firms surged from 9% to 41% in one year. McKinsey says 44% of legal tasks are technically automatable. The World Economic Forum lists bookkeeping among the fastest-declining roles. Here's what this actually means for Belgian tax professionals — and what it doesn't.
A search engine finds text. A knowledge graph navigates relationships: which article amends which, which ruling interprets what, which exception overrides the rule. Belgian tax law is a web of cross-references — and a knowledge graph is the map.
Before your legal AI tool can answer a question, it has to cut the law into pieces. The way it cuts determines whether the answer includes the exception that changes everything — or misses it entirely.
Harvey users report 37 hours per month. Thomson Reuters claims 63% reduction. We looked at the real numbers for Belgian tax research — and built a conservative estimate that doesn't require you to believe marketing claims.