Skip to main content

Blog

AI in legal research, and Belgian tax law in practice

Explore glossary

Behind the scenes: how a law change flows through a legal AI system

When Belgium's programme law amends 47 provisions overnight, what happens inside the AI tool you rely on? A transparent look at the ingestion pipeline.

ingestion pipeline legal AI data quality transparency Belgian tax law

Case study: estate planning across three regions. One family, three tax outcomes

A couple in Antwerp with €2M in assets. Two children in different regions. Three inheritance tax regimes. Here's how the numbers diverge, and what a complete advisory analysis actually looks like.

Three regions, three tax systems: why Belgian fiscal advice requires side-by-side comparison

Belgium has three inheritance tax regimes, three gift tax structures, and three registration duty rates. Each has a different reform timeline. Here's what that means for advisors and why no single answer is ever complete.

Case study: why one TAK 23 product needs five tax answers

A single TAK 23 life insurance product touches insurance tax, income tax, withholding tax, TOB, and regional inheritance tax. Here's what most advisors, and every AI chatbot, miss.

TAK 23 cross-domain tax Belgian tax case study life insurance

5 Belgian tax questions where generic AI is guaranteed to fail

These aren't trick questions. They're routine queries any tax professional faces. But they expose five architectural blind spots that no general-purpose AI can fix with a better prompt.

I asked ChatGPT and Auryth the same Belgian tax questions. Here's what happened

Three tax questions, two AI tools, one clear lesson: for professional research, verifiability beats confidence.